Great Supreme court ruling
Priest's counseling documents allowed in sexual misconduct suit By GARRY MITCHELL Associated Press Writer Last Updated:November 10. 2006 5:07PM Published: November 10. 2006 5:07PM MOBILE, Ala The Alabama Supreme Court has ruled that a Mobile woman's lawyer should get the psychological counseling documents on a Roman Catholic priest for use in her lawsuit against the church that involves alleged sexual misconduct. The Rev. Paul G. Zoghby contended the documents sought by lawyers for a former parishioner, Linda Ledet, are confidential and were released only to Archbishop Oscar Lipscomb as his "spiritual counselor." Lipscomb had restored Zoghby to the ministry after he underwent counseling at a New York monastery and hospital for sexual misconduct. A Mobile County judge granted Ledet's lawyers use of the documents with some court restrictions, but the priest's attorney appealed that decision, leading to Thursday's state Supreme Court order. In its ruling, Justice Lyn Stuart, writing for the majority, said Zoghby "has not established that the trial court exceeded the scope of its discretion in holding that these documents are not protected from disclosure." The Mobile court's discovery order protects the contents of these documents and prevents unnecessary public release of what they contain, the high court noted, saying Zoghby's rights are adequately protected. A trial on the lawsuit is expected early next year. Vince Kilborn Jr., the priest's attorney, said Friday he doesn't expect the records will be used at trial, but he may ask the high court to reconsider it's ruling because he contends Lipscomb was "clearly giving" Zoghby spiritual advice. He said Zoghby is not a defendant in Leder's suit against the archidocese. Ledet's attorneys were unavailable for comment. Ledet's complaint against the Catholic Archdiocese of Mobile claims that Zoghby, while serving as her pastor at a high-profile Mobile church, attempted to "force her, physically and by command as a priest, to engage in sexual relations with him," beginning in 1997. She filed a complaint with the church in 2002 after church officials extended an invitation to victims of abuse. Lipscomb confronted Zoghby. According to court documents, Ledet was told Zoghby would not be placed in a position where he could further harm others. As part of the agreement, Ledet would keep silent about what had occurred. But in 2003, she learned that Zoghby had returned to active ministry in a Baldwin County parish near Mobile. Ledet, who underwent therapy for the alleged abuse, complained to Lipscomb about Zoghby's return. She presented bills for her treatment to the archdiocese for payment, but the church refused to pay, according to court documents. Ledet sued the archdiocese and Lipscomb in 2004, alleging breach of contract. As the case advanced, she learned that Zoghby had been sent to Trinity Retreat, a church counseling center in New York state that is connected to a psychiatric hospital. Her attorney sought records from Zoghby's time spent at the center, which the church claimed were confidential and privileged. In an affidavit, Zoghby said the documents were released to Lipscomb "as my bishop and a spiritual adviser." But Ledet's attorney contended Zoghby waived the psychotherapist-patient privilege by authorizing the release of the documents to Lipscomb and that the archbishop was acting as an administrator, not a spiritual adviser, when he got them.
3 comments:
I have always said that these documents that they want to keep hidden should not be allowed to be hidden away to keep their secrets from being exposed so I for one am delighted to hear this news indeed:)
~Maria~
(my second attempt!)
Just as long as it's okay for Linda Ledet's psychiatric records to be revealed also (which she has fought).
My family has been affected by sexual abuse, so we know all about the crap that goes on in cases like this. I just hope you're not rejoicing about this ruling simply because it's a priest who was 'accused'. Ms. Ledet's not wanting her records to be revealed, and not pressing charges against the priest, give rise to a lot of questions on her behavior.
Hello Anonymous:)
Isn't it strange how people want to post as Anonymous it begs to me the question WHY? would someone want to do this rahter than give their name makes me wonder is their a hidden agenda maybe just curious and it leaves me with these questions why not give their name even their first name would suffice I always and have always since day one on the net used my name right up front I have nothing to hide or any hidden agendas just thought I would make that clear:)why would I not or for that matter why would someone else not who actually takes the time and trouble and replies on somones blog just seems very strange to me tis all perhaps you would like to clarify for me my burning question of WHY??? I look forward to reading your reply and here is thanking you in advance of your reply:)
Love
~Maria~
xxx
Post a Comment